Last week, the article A future for the world’s children? A WHO–UNICEF–Lancet Commission was published in the Lancet with an assessment of environments conducive to childhood flourishing in 180 countries of the world. Children’s rights were broadly grouped as:
- The right to be educated
- The right to be heard
- The right to be healthy
- The right to be protected
- The right to be treated fairly
How did the UK rank?
The UK ranked 10 out of 180 for providing an environment where children are able to flourish – not too bad. However, there’s a bleak outlook when looking at sustainability and the environment. It seems as though countries are forced to choose between an environment ripe for children to flourish and an environment that flourishes.
We took data from the Lancet article and mapped some key variables against each other to get a better overall picture of the report’s findings. We took the childhood flourishing index, CO2 emissions per capita and performance in comparison to the 2030 CO2 targets for the 180 countries included in the report and ‘data-vizzed’ them below to see what’s going on. There are interesting patterns for the top 10 and bottom 10 performing countries.
- Children are most likely to flourish in higher income countries.
- Higher income countries are often some of the biggest polluters.
- Higher income countries are generally not the ones meeting the 2030 C02 emissions targets.
- None of the top 10 countries of the childhood flourishing index are currently meeting the 2030 CO2 targets. All 10 bottom countries currently do.
- It looks like no country is currently is achieving the best of both worlds: an environment for children to flourish in and sustainability for our planet.
Clearly, there is work to be done to tackle this inverse relationship between our children’s future and sustainability for out planet.
In reality, surely, both go hand-in-hand.